I also quite like the picture that she used for the essay:
What is this blog about?
What is this blog about?
I am a political philosopher. My 'political philosophy' is a form of 'liberal egalitarianism.' So in this blog I reflect on various issues in political philosophy and politics (especially Canadian and American politics) from a liberal egalitarian perspective.
If you are curious about what I mean by 'liberal egalitarianism,' my views are strongly influenced by the conception of justice advanced by John Rawls. (So I sometimes refer to myself as a 'Rawlsian,' even though I disagree with Rawls on some matters.)
Astonishingly, I am paid to write and teach moral and political philosophy. I somehow manage to do this despite my akratic nature. Here is my faculty profile.
Saturday, October 27, 2018
Just Leisure?
Last summer I was asked by for The Forum (the LSE’s public philosophy website) to write up a shorter—and hopefully more readable—version of the argument from my recent Philosophical Studies article, ‘“The Kids are Alright”: political liberalism, leisure time, and childhood’. That essay—‘Just Leisure?’—was published a couple of months ago and is available to read here. I’m pretty happy with how it turned out, and am grateful to The Forum’s editor, Elizabeth Hannon, for all her help with it.
I also quite like the picture that she used for the essay:
I also quite like the picture that she used for the essay:
Wednesday, October 17, 2018
Libertarianism = feudalism
Existential comics helpfully explains why libertarianism (of the sort
endorsed by Robert Nozick in Anarchy,
State, and Utopia) leads to (a kind of) feudalism...
[For a more academic explanation, read Samuel Freeman’s article “Why Libertarianism Is Not a Liberal View” (Philosophy and Public Affairs 30(2):105-151 (2001)).]
Labels:
feudalism,
humour,
libertarianism,
liberty,
negative liberty,
political philosophy,
Robert Nozick
Friday, October 5, 2018
Ted Cruz: Master Debater
This post, “Owning the Peanut Gallery,” by Maria Farrell at the ‘Crooked Timber’ blog is well worth
reading—especially by anyone who ever participated in university-level debating
in North America. It is hilarious and does a great job in capturing what it was
like to take part in university tournaments in the early 1990s, especially from
the perspective of Canadian teams visiting the U.S. And of course any post that
further illuminates the comprehensive awfulness of Ted Cruz is worthy of
praise.
The post brought back my own
memories of debating in Canada around the same time (I represented University College
at University of Toronto). I recall going to tournaments at Yale and Harvard,
and encountering Cruz (and Austan Goolsbee, and others), although—thankfully—I
don’t recall ever debating Cruz myself.
(Nitpick: A friend points out
that this claim in the post is incorrect: “We’re the highest ranked Canadian team at a US tournament, ever, at that
point [1993].” A team from the University of Toronto
made it to the finals at Harvard in
1992.)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)