(For the record, I think that the ‘argument’ fails miserably against any plausible version of luck egalitarianism. But even if I were wrong about that, I would be untroubled, as I belong to the ‘relational egalitarian’ camp—along with thinkers like Elizabeth Anderson, John Rawls, Samuel Scheffler, Joshua Cohen, among others—for reasons explained here.)
And as for libertarianism’s claim to be concerned with ‘liberty’, I found this recent post from Existential Comics rather amusing.
UPDATE: for a clearer explanation of this brouhaha, see "Own Troll" by John Holbo at the Crooked Timber blog.
UPDATE 2: Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo weighs in on the matter.
Some follow-up discussion of 'deep thinker' Robin Hanson's discussion of access to sex, rape, etc., here: http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2018/04/no-particular-order
ReplyDelete(I refuse to link to his original posts, but the relevant links can be found at the LGM blog posts).